The Government Accountability Office has issued over 200 recommendations to the SBA since 2015. The SBA Inspector General has published dozens of damning reports. Congressional committees have held countless hearings. And yet, nothing changes.
The SBA operates in a unique space in the federal government—too small to attract sustained attention, too critical to shut down, and too politically useful to reform. This creates a perfect environment for institutional dysfunction.
The GAO's Endless Warnings
The Government Accountability Office is the federal government's watchdog. When the GAO makes recommendations, agencies are supposed to implement them. The SBA treats GAO recommendations like suggestions at best, and annoyances at worst.
- Total recommendations since 2015: 217
- Fully implemented: 89
- Partially implemented: 52
- Open/unaddressed: 76
- Average time to implement: 4.3 years
Among the unaddressed recommendations: fixing IT systems, improving loan servicing, strengthening fraud controls, and better tracking loan performance. These aren't obscure technical issues—they're fundamental to the SBA's mission.
The Inspector General Reports Nobody Reads
The SBA Office of Inspector General exists specifically to identify waste, fraud, and abuse within the agency. Their reports read like horror stories of mismanagement.
Some greatest hits from recent IG reports:
- September 2024: SBA failed to verify borrower eligibility in 47% of sampled EIDL loans
- June 2024: $200 billion in potentially fraudulent COVID loans identified
- March 2024: Customer service response times exceeded targets by 340%
- December 2023: Loan modification processing backlog exceeded 500,000 applications
- August 2023: Internal controls rated "materially weak" for fourth consecutive year
These reports are public. Journalists write about them. Congressional staffers read them. And then... nothing. The next quarter, the IG issues another report documenting the same problems.
Congressional Hearings: Sound and Fury
Every few months, SBA administrators are summoned to Capitol Hill to explain themselves. These hearings follow a predictable pattern:
- Members of Congress express outrage at latest failures
- SBA administrator promises to "do better"
- Specific commitments are made with specific timelines
- Everyone goes home
- Nothing changes
- Repeat
"We've been holding hearings on SBA failures for 15 years. I've heard the same promises from four different administrators. At some point, we have to ask whether hearings accomplish anything."
— Congressional staffer (anonymous)
The problem is that congressional hearings are theater. There are no real consequences for failing to meet commitments. Administrators can't be fired by Congress. Budgets rarely get cut for poor performance. And by the time the next hearing rolls around, everyone has forgotten what was promised.
Why Accountability Fails
Several structural factors protect the SBA from meaningful oversight:
1. Political cover from disasters. Every hurricane, flood, or pandemic gives the SBA a new mission and new funding. It's hard to punish an agency that's "helping disaster victims," even when it's helping them badly.
2. Diffuse responsibility. The SBA has multiple Congressional oversight committees, each with different priorities. This fragmentation means no single committee takes ownership of fixing problems.
3. Contractor insulation. Most SBA operations are performed by contractors. When things fail, the SBA blames contractors. The contractors blame the SBA. No one is accountable.
4. Revolving leadership. SBA administrators average 2-3 years in the position. By the time they understand the problems, they're gone. Their successors start from scratch.
5. Mission creep. The SBA's portfolio has expanded dramatically—disaster loans, COVID relief, small business grants, government contracting support. The agency is stretched thin, giving it endless excuses for underperformance.
What Would Real Accountability Look Like?
If Congress were serious about SBA reform, here's what would happen:
- Mandatory IG recommendation implementation with real deadlines and consequences
- Performance-based budgeting that ties funding to measurable outcomes
- Leadership stability requirements to prevent constant turnover
- Consolidated oversight under a single committee with clear authority
- Public dashboards tracking loan processing times, customer service metrics, and fraud rates
None of this will happen. The SBA serves too many political purposes in its current dysfunctional form. Disaster relief announcements make great press releases. Small business initiatives are campaign staples. Nobody wins elections by fixing boring operational problems.
The Borrower's Reality
While oversight institutions issue reports that get filed and forgotten, real borrowers suffer the consequences. Every GAO recommendation that sits unimplemented represents thousands of small business owners trapped in a broken system.
The oversight exists. The problems are documented. The solutions are known. What's missing is the political will to force change. Until that changes, borrowers will continue to be collateral damage in a system designed to look like it's working rather than actually work.
← BACK TO BLOG